Compare:
vs
NCEES Model
New York
2
Pathways
2/4
Standard Coverage
Missing Pathways
  • Engineering Technology Pathway
  • Non-ABET Evaluation Pathway
NCEES Model
Reference standard for PE licensure
4
Expected Pathways
1 Looser
1 Different
2 Missing
Validation Warnings
New York: Comity/Reciprocity Pathway (No exams captured)
NCEES Model: Comity/Reciprocity Pathway (No exams captured; Experience requirement missing)
ABET-Accredited Pathway
Looser
New York
Education: BS | EAC/ABET | engineering | Experience ≥ 4 yrs | Exams: FE, PE
NCEES Model
Education: BS | EAC/ABET | engineering | Experience ≥ 4 yrs | Exams: FE, PE | References: 5 professional
Key Differences:
  • References requirement missing (baseline requires 5)
Comity/Reciprocity Pathway
Different
New York
Education: BS | EAC/ABET | engineering | Experience ≥ 4 yrs | Comity: Accepts MLE
NCEES Model
State Law Exam | Comity: Accepts MLE, Accepts Council Record
Key Differences:
  • Additional education options: BS | EAC/ABET | engineering
  • Experience requirement added (board ≥ 4 yrs)
  • State law exam missing
  • Does not accept NCEES record like baseline
Engineering Technology Pathway
Missing
New York
Not available
NCEES Model
Education: BS | EAC/ABET | engineering technology | Experience ≥ 6 yrs | Exams: FE, PE | References: 5 professional
Key Differences:
  • Not present on board
Non-ABET Evaluation Pathway
Missing
New York
Not available
NCEES Model
Education: BS | EAC/ABET | engineering | Experience ≥ 4 yrs | Exams: FE, PE | References: 5 professional
Key Differences:
  • Not present on board
Status Legend
Aligned Requirements match baseline
Stricter More demanding than baseline
Looser Less demanding than baseline
Different Different approach, not comparable
Missing Board lacks this pathway
Additional Board has extra pathway